| |  |
PARALLEL HISTORY BIBLE - Mark 12:6
CHAPTERS: Mark 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 
VERSES: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44
TEXT: BIB | AUDIO: MISLR - MISC - DAVIS - FOCHT | VIDEO: BIB
ENGLISH - HISTORY - INTERNATIONAL - FACEBOOK - GR FORUMS - GODRULES ON YOUTUBE
HELPS: KJS - KJV - ASV - DBY - DOU - WBS - YLT - HEB - BBE - WEB - NAS - SEV - TSK - CRK - WES - MHC - GILL - JFB
|
LXX- Greek Septuagint - Mark 12:6 ετι 2089 ουν 3767 ενα 1520 υιον 5207 εχων 2192 5723 αγαπητον 27 αυτου 846 απεστειλεν 649 5656 και 2532 αυτον 846 προς 4314 αυτους 846 εσχατον 2078 λεγων 3004 5723 οτι 3754 εντραπησονται 1788 5691 τον 3588 υιον 5207 μου 3450
Douay Rheims Bible Therefore having yet one son, most dear to him; he also sent him unto them last of all, saying: They will reverence my son.
King James Bible - Mark 12:6 Having yet therefore one son, his wellbeloved, he sent him also last unto them, saying, They will reverence my son.
World English Bible Therefore still having one, his beloved son, he sent him last to them, saying, 'They will respect my son.'
Early Church Father Links Anf-09 iv.iii.xxxiii Pg 67, Npnf-114 vi.ii Pg 236, Npnf-114 vii.ii Pg 236, Npnf-210 iv.iv.vii.xviii Pg 20
World Wide Bible Resources
Mark 12:6
Early Christian Commentary - (A.D. 100 - A.D. 325) Anf-01 viii.ii.xl Pg 3
Ps. i., Ps. ii.
Anf-01 viii.iv.ciii Pg 5
Ps. ii. 7; Matt. iii. 17. is recorded in the memoirs of the apostles to have come to Him and tempted Him, even so far as to say to Him, ‘Worship me;’ and Christ answered him, ‘Get thee behind me, Satan: thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and Him only shalt thou serve.’2345 2345
Anf-01 viii.iv.lxxxviii Pg 5
Ps. ii. 7. [the Father] saying that His generation would take place for men, at the time when they would become acquainted with Him: ‘Thou art My Son; this day have I begotten thee.’ ”2301 2301 The repetition seems quite superfluous.
Anf-01 viii.iv.cxxii Pg 9
Ps. ii. 7 f.
Anf-01 ii.ii.xxxvi Pg 8
Ps. ii. 7, 8; Heb. i. 5. And again He saith to Him, “Sit Thou at My right hand, until I make Thine enemies Thy footstool.”160 160
Anf-03 v.iv.iv.xx Pg 6
Ps. ii. 7. You will not be able to put in a claim for some son of David being here meant, rather than Christ; or for the ends of the earth being promised to David, whose kingdom was confined to the Jewish nation simply, rather than to Christ, who now embraces the whole world in the faith of His gospel. So again He says by Isaiah: “I have given Thee for a dispensation of the people, for a light of the Gentiles, to open the eyes of the blind,” that is, those that be in error, “to bring out the prisoners from the prison,” that is, to free them from sin, “and from the prison-house,” that is, of death, “those that sit in darkness”—even that of ignorance.3375 3375
Anf-03 v.iv.v.xxii Pg 33
Ps. ii. 7. By the mouth of Isaiah also He had asked concerning Him, “Who is there among you that feareth God? Let him hear the voice of His Son.”4350 4350
Anf-03 v.iv.v.xxii Pg 42
Tertullian, by introducing this statement with an “inquit,” seems to make a quotation of it; but it is only a comment on the actual quotations. Tertullian’s invariable object in this argument is to match some event or word pertaining to the Christ of the New Testament with some declaration of the Old Testament. In this instance the approving words of God upon the mount are in Heb. i. 5 applied to the Son, while in Ps. ii. 7 the Son applies them to Himself. Compare the Adversus Praxean, chap. xix. (Fr. Junius and Oehler). It is, however, more likely that Tertullian really means to quote Isa. xliv. 26, “that confirmeth the word of His servant,” which Tertullian reads, “Sistens verba filii sui,” the Septuagint being, Καὶ ἰστῶν ῥῆμα παιδὸς αὐτοῦ. He establishes the words of His Son, when He says, “This is my beloved Son, hear ye Him.” Therefore, even if there be made a transfer of the obedient “hearing” from Moses and Elias to4359 4359 In Christo. In with an ablative is often used by our author for in with an accusative. Christ, it is still not from another God, or to another Christ; but from4360 4360 Or perhaps “by the Creator.” the Creator to His Christ, in consequence of the departure of the old covenant and the supervening of the new. “Not an ambassador, nor an angel, but He Himself,” says Isaiah, “shall save them;”4361 4361
Anf-03 v.ix.vii Pg 11
Ps. ii. 7. even before the morning star did I beget Thee. The Son likewise acknowledges the Father, speaking in His own person, under the name of Wisdom: “The Lord formed Me as the beginning of His ways, with a view to His own works; before all the hills did He beget Me.”7832 7832
Anf-03 v.ix.xi Pg 6
Ps. ii. 7. If you want me to believe Him to be both the Father and the Son, show me some other passage where it is declared, “The Lord said unto Himself, I am my own Son, to-day have I begotten myself;” or again, “Before the morning did I beget myself;”7879 7879
Anf-03 iv.ix.xii Pg 3
Ps. ii. 7, 8. For you will not be able to affirm that “son” to be David rather than Christ; or the “bounds of the earth” to have been promised rather to David, who reigned within the single (country of) Judea, than to Christ, who has already taken captive the whole orb with the faith of His gospel; as He says through Isaiah: “Behold, I have given Thee for a covenant1380 1380 Dispositionem; Gr. διαθήκην. of my family, for a light of Gentiles, that Thou mayst open the eyes of the blind”—of course, such as err—“to outloose from bonds the bound”—that is, to free them from sins—“and from the house of prison”—that is, of death—“such as sit in darkness”1381 1381
Npnf-201 iii.vi.iii Pg 14
Anf-01 v.ii.xviii Pg 9
Isa. vii. 14; Matt. i. 23. He was born and was baptized by John, that He might ratify the institution committed to that prophet.
Anf-01 ix.iv.x Pg 9
Matt. i. 23. David likewise speaks of Him who, from the virgin, is Emmanuel: “Turn not away the face of Thine anointed. The Lord hath sworn a truth to David, and will not turn from him. Of the fruit of thy body will I set upon thy seat.”3380 3380
Anf-01 v.xv.iii Pg 5
Isa. vii. 14; Matt. i. 23. And concerning the passion, “He was led as a sheep to the slaughter; and as a lamb before her shearers is dumb, I also was an innocent lamb led to be sacrificed.”1228 1228
Anf-01 ix.iv.xxii Pg 14
Matt. i. 23. But the elders have thus interpreted what Esaias said: “And the Lord, moreover, said unto Ahaz, Ask for thyself a sign from the Lord thy God out of the depth below, or from the height above. And Ahaz said, I will not ask, and I will not tempt the Lord. And he said, It is not a small thing3718 3718 We here read “non pusillum” for “num pusillum,” as in some texts. Cyprian and Tertullian confirm the former reading. for you to weary men; and how does the Lord weary them? Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son; and ye shall call His name Emmanuel. Butter and honey shall He eat: before He knows or chooses out things that are evil, He shall exchange them for what is good; for before the child knows good or evil, He shall not consent to evil, that He may choose that which is good.”3719 3719
Anf-03 iv.ix.ix Pg 5
See Matt. i. 23. ): “butter and honey shall he eat;”1253 1253
Anf-03 v.vii.xvii Pg 5
Matt. i. 23. This is the new nativity; a man is born in God. And in this man God was born, taking the flesh of an ancient race, without the help, however, of the ancient seed, in order that He might reform it with a new seed, that is, in a spiritual manner, and cleanse it by the re-moval of all its ancient stains. But the whole of this new birth was prefigured, as was the case in all other instances, in ancient type, the Lord being born as man by a dispensation in which a virgin was the medium. The earth was still in a virgin state, reduced as yet by no human labour, with no seed as yet cast into its furrows, when, as we are told, God made man out of it into a living soul.7183 7183
Anf-03 v.vii.xxi Pg 3
Isa. vii. 14; Matt. i. 23. Conceive what? I ask. The Word of God, of course, and not the seed of man, and in order, certainly, to bring forth a son. “For,” says he, “she shall bring forth a son.”7229 7229 See the same passages. Therefore, as the act of conception was her own,7230 7230 Ipsius. so also what she brought forth was her own, also, although the cause of conception7231 7231 Quod concepit: or, “what she conceived.” was not. If, on the other hand, the Word became flesh of Himself, then He both conceived and brought forth Himself, and the prophecy is stultified. For in that case a virgin did not conceive, and did not bring forth; since whatever she brought forth from the conception of the Word, is not her own flesh. But is this the only statement of prophecy which will be frustrated?7232 7232 Evacuabitur. Will not the angel’s announcement also be subverted, that the virgin should “conceive in her womb and bring forth a son?”7233 7233
Anf-03 v.viii.xx Pg 3
Isa. vii. 14; Matt. i. 23. Even granting that He was figuratively to take the power of Damascus and the spoils of Samaria,7396 7396
Anf-03 v.ix.xxvii Pg 5
Matt. i. 23. Besides, the flesh is not God, so that it could not have been said concerning it, “That Holy Thing shall be called the Son of God,” but only that Divine Being who was born in the flesh, of whom the psalm also says, “Since God became man in the midst of it, and established it by the will of the Father.”8153 8153
Npnf-201 iii.x.ix Pg 44
Anf-01 ix.ii.xxi Pg 13
Matt. xi. 25–27. In these words they affirm that He clearly showed that the Father of truth, conjured into existence by them, was known to no one before His advent. And they desire to construe the passage as if teaching that the Maker and Framer [of the world] was always known by all, while the Lord spoke these words concerning the Father unknown to all, whom they now proclaim.
Anf-01 viii.ii.lxiii Pg 3
Matt. xi. 27. Now the Word of God is His Son, as we have before said. And He is called Angel and Apostle; for He declares whatever we ought to know, and is sent forth to declare whatever is revealed; as our Lord Himself says, “He that heareth Me, heareth Him that sent Me.”1900 1900
Anf-01 ix.iii.vii Pg 2
Matt. xi. 27. yet all [beings] do know this one fact at least, because reason, implanted in their minds, moves them, and reveals to them [the truth] that there is one God, the Lord of all.
Anf-01 viii.ii.lxiii Pg 7
Matt. xi. 27. The Jews, accordingly, being throughout of opinion that it was the Father of the universe who spake to Moses, though He who spake to him was indeed the Son of God, who is called both Angel and Apostle, are justly charged, both by the Spirit of prophecy and by Christ Himself, with knowing neither the Father nor the Son. For they who affirm that the Son is the Father, are proved neither to have become acquainted with the Father, nor to know that the Father of the universe has a Son; who also, being the first-begotten Word of God, is even God. And of old He appeared in the shape of fire and in the likeness of an angel to Moses and to the other prophets; but now in the times of your reign,1904 1904 [Rather, “of your empire.”] having, as we before said, become Man by a virgin, according to the counsel of the Father, for the salvation of those who believe on Him, He endured both to be set at nought and to suffer, that by dying and rising again He might conquer death. And that which was said out of the bush to Moses, “I am that I am, the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, and the God of your fathers,”1905 1905
Anf-01 viii.iv.c Pg 2
Matt. xi. 27. Accordingly He revealed to us all that we have perceived by His grace out of the Scriptures, so that we know Him to be the first-begotten of God, and to be before all creatures; likewise to be the Son of the patriarchs, since He assumed flesh by the Virgin of their family, and submitted to become a man without comeliness, dishonoured, and subject to suffering. Hence, also, among His words He said, when He was discoursing about His future sufferings: ‘The Son of man must suffer many things, and be rejected by the Pharisees and Scribes, and be crucified, and on the third day rise again.’2329 2329
Anf-01 ix.iii.xv Pg 21
Matt. xi. 27. unless indeed they maintain that their seed or Mother is No-one.
Anf-01 ix.vi.vii Pg 2
Matt. xi. 27; Luke x. 22. Thus hath Matthew set it down, and Luke in like manner, and Mark3858 3858 Not now to be found in Mark’s Gospel. the very same; for John omits this passage. They, however, who would be wiser than the apostles, write [the verse] in the following manner: “No man knew the Father, but the Son; nor the Son, but the Father, and he to whom the Son has willed to reveal [Him];” and they explain it as if the true God were known to none prior to our Lord’s advent; and that God who was announced by the prophets, they allege not to be the Father of Christ.
Anf-01 ix.vi.vii Pg 7
[A most emphatic and pregnant text which Irenæus here expounds with great beauty. The reference (St. Matt. xi. 27) seems to have been inadvertently omitted in this place where the repetition is desirable.] “No man knoweth the Son but the Father, nor the Father but the Son, and those to whomsoever the Son shall reveal Him;” thus setting Himself forth and the Father as He [really] is, that we may not receive any other Father, except Him who is revealed by the Son.
Anf-01 ix.vi.vii Pg 17
Matt. xi. 27; Luke x. 22. Harvey observes here, that “it is remarkable that this text, having been correctly quoted a short time previously in accordance with the received Greek text, ᾧ ἐὰν βούλητας ὁ υἱὸς ἀποκαλύψαι, the translator now not only uses the single verb revelaverit, but says pointedly that it was so written by the venerable author.” It is probable, therefore, that the previous passage has been made to harmonize with the received text by a later hand; with which, however, the Syriac form agrees. For “shall reveal” was said not with reference to the future alone, as if then [only] the Word had begun to manifest the Father when He was born of Mary, but it applies indifferently throughout all time. For the Son, being present with His own handiwork from the beginning, reveals the Father to all; to whom He wills, and when He wills, and as the Father wills. Wherefore, then, in all things, and through all things, there is one God, the Father, and one Word, and one Son, and one Spirit, and one salvation to all who believe in Him.
Anf-01 ix.vi.viii Pg 18
Matt. xi. 27; Luke x. 22. do introduce another unknown Father.
Anf-01 ix.vi.xxi Pg 8
Matt. xi. 27. manifestly by Him who made all things; for He did not deliver to Him the things of another, but His own. But in all things [it is implied that] nothing has been kept back [from Him], and for this reason the same person is the Judge of the living and the dead; “having the key of David: He shall open, and no man shall shut: He shall shut, and no man shall open.”4069 4069
Anf-02 vi.ii.i Pg 34.1
Anf-02 vi.iii.i.v Pg 35.1
Anf-02 vi.iv.i.xxviii Pg 7.1
Anf-02 vi.iv.v.xiii Pg 5.1
Anf-02 vi.iv.vii.x Pg 13.1
Anf-02 vi.v Pg 16.1
Anf-03 v.iv.iii.xxvii Pg 22
Matt. xi. 27. For even in the Old Testament He had declared, “No man shall see me, and live.”3064 3064
Anf-03 v.iii.xxi Pg 3
Matt. xi. 27. Nor does the Son seem to have revealed Him to any other than the apostles, whom He sent forth to preach—that, of course, which He revealed to them. Now, what that was which they preached—in other words, what it was which Christ revealed to them—can, as I must here likewise prescribe, properly be proved in no other way than by those very churches which the apostles founded in person, by declaring the gospel to them directly themselves, both vivâ voce, as the phrase is, and subsequently by their epistles. If, then, these things are so, it is in the same degree2063 2063 Perinde. manifest that all doctrine which agrees with the apostolic churches—those moulds2064 2064 Matricibus. and original sources of the faith must be reckoned for truth, as undoubtedly containing that which the (said) churches received from the apostles, the apostles from Christ, Christ from God. Whereas all doctrine must be prejudged2065 2065 Præjudicandam. [This then is Præscription.] as false2066 2066 De mendacio. which savours of contrariety to the truth of the churches and apostles of Christ and God. It remains, then, that we demonstrate whether this doctrine of ours, of which we have now given the rule, has its origin2067 2067 Censeatur. in the tradition of the apostles, and whether all other doctrines do not ipso facto2068 2068 Ex hoc ipso, “from this very circumstance.” proceed from falsehood. We hold communion with the apostolic churches because our doctrine is in no respect different from theirs. This is our witness of truth.
Anf-03 v.ix.viii Pg 6
Matt. xi. 27. and has Himself unfolded “the Father’s bosom.”7850 7850
Anf-03 v.ix.xxiv Pg 11
Matt. xi. 27. and, “As the Father quickeneth (the dead), so also doth the Son;”8101 8101
Anf-03 v.ix.xxvi Pg 18
Matt. xi. 27; Luke x. 22. and promises that, as the Son of the Father, He will confess those who confess Him, and deny those who deny Him, before His Father.8141 8141
Npnf-201 iii.vi.ii Pg 7
Treasury of Scriptural Knowledge, Chapter 12VERSE (6) - Ps 2:7 Mt 1:23; 11:27; 26:63 Joh 1:14,18,34,49; 3:16-18
|
|
PARALLEL VERSE BIBLE
|
