| |  |
PARALLEL HISTORY BIBLE - Luke 22:68
CHAPTERS: Luke 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 
VERSES: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71
TEXT: BIB | AUDIO: MISLR - DAVIS - FOCHT | VIDEO: BIB
ENGLISH - HISTORY - INTERNATIONAL - FACEBOOK - GR FORUMS - GODRULES ON YOUTUBE
HELPS: KJS - KJV - ASV - DBY - DOU - WBS - YLT - HEB - BBE - WEB - NAS - SEV - TSK - CRK - WES - MHC - GILL - JFB
|
εαν 1437 δε 1161 και 2532 ερωτησω 2065 5661 ου 3756 μη 3361 αποκριθητε 611 5676 μοι 3427 η 2228 απολυσητε 630 5661
Douay Rheims Bible And if I shall also ask you, you will not answer me, nor let me go.
King James Bible - Luke 22:68 And if I also ask you, ye will not answer me, nor let me go.
World English Bible and if I ask, you will in no way answer me or let me go.
Early Church Father Links Anf-09 iv.iii.xlix Pg 46
World Wide Bible Resources
Luke 22:68
Early Christian Commentary - (A.D. 100 - A.D. 325) Anf-03 v.iv.v.xxxviii Pg 35
Luke xx. 41. in order that He might show Himself whom the blind man, following the doctrine of the Scribes, had simply declared to be the Son of David, to be also his Lord. He thus honoured the blind man’s faith which had acknowledged His Sonship to David; but at the same time He struck a blow at the tradition of the Scribes, which prevented them from knowing that He was also (David’s) Lord. Whatever had relation to the glory of the Creator’s Christ, no other would thus guard and maintain5014 5014 Tueretur. but Himself the Creator’s Christ.
Anf-03 v.iv.v.xxxviii Pg 32
Luke xx. 41–44. what relation has this to Christ? David did not literally confute5011 5011 Non obtundebat. an error of the Scribes, yet David asserted the honour of Christ, when he more prominently affirmed that He was his Lord than his Son,—an attribute which was hardly suitable to the destroyer of the Creator. But how consistent is the interpretation on our side of the question! For He, who had been a little while ago invoked by the blind man as “the Son of David,”5012 5012
Anf-03 v.iv.v.xxxviii Pg 32
Luke xx. 41–44. what relation has this to Christ? David did not literally confute5011 5011 Non obtundebat. an error of the Scribes, yet David asserted the honour of Christ, when he more prominently affirmed that He was his Lord than his Son,—an attribute which was hardly suitable to the destroyer of the Creator. But how consistent is the interpretation on our side of the question! For He, who had been a little while ago invoked by the blind man as “the Son of David,”5012 5012
Lifetimes x.xiii Pg 99.1
VERSE (68) - Lu 20:3-7,41-44
|
|
PARALLEL VERSE BIBLE
|
