SEV Biblia, Chapter 15:63
Mas a los jebuseos que habitaban en Jerusalén, los hijos de Judá no los pudieron desarraigar; antes quedó el jebuseo en Jerusalén con los hijos de Judá, hasta hoy.
Clarke's Bible Commentary - Joshua 15:63
Verse 63. The Jebusites dwell-at Jerusalem unto this day.] The whole history of Jerusalem, previously to the time of David, is encumbered with many difficulties. Sometimes it is attributed to Judah, sometimes to Benjamin, and it is probable that, being on the frontiers of both those tribes, each possessed a part of it. If the Jebusites were ever driven out before the time of David, it is certain they recovered it again, or at least a part of it-what is called the citadel or strong hold of Zion, (see 2 Sam. v. 7,) which he took from them; after which the city fell wholly into the hands of the Israelites. This verse is an additional proof that the book of Joshua was not written after the times of the Jewish kings, as some have endeavoured to prove; for when this verse was written, the Jebusites dwelt with the children of Judah, which they did not after the days of David; therefore the book was written before there were any kings in Judea. IT is very likely, not only that many cities have by the lapse of time changed their names or been totally destroyed, (see the note on ver. 1,) but that the names of those in the preceding catalogue have been changed also, several of them repeated that should have been mentioned but once, and not a few confounded with the terms by which they are described. But we must not suppose that every repetition of the name is through the carelessness of copyists; for there are often two places which bear the same name, which is frequently the case in England. But besides this, villages are mentioned as being apparently in the tribe of Judah, which afterwards appear to have been in an other tribe. The reason appears to be this: many towns are mentioned which were frontier towns, and when the limits of a tribe are pointed out, such places must necessarily be mentioned, though allotted to a different tribe. This consideration will serve to remove several difficulties which occur in the reading of this and the following chapters.
John Gill's Bible Commentary
Ver. 63. As for the Jebusites, the inhabitants of Jerusalem , etc.] From whom the city was called Jebus, ( Judges 19:10). The Jews say, that these Jebusites were not those of the seven nations; but there was a man whose name was Jebus, and he was of the Philistines, of the seed of Abimelech, and the place was called by his name Jebus; and the men of that family that dwelt at Jerusalem, their names were called Jebusites, having their descent from him; so Araunah, the Jebusite, was king of that place: and the fort of that place was Zion, which was at Jerusalem: so Kimchi relates from their Rabbins, and with whom Jarchi agrees, but without any foundation; there is no doubt to be made of it, that these Jebusites were Canaanites: the children of Judah could not drive them out ; according to the above Jewish writers they could have done it, but it was not fit and proper they should, because of the oath of Abraham to Abimelech, from whom they suppose these Jebusites sprung; but the case was this; though Joshua slew the king of this place, and took his land with the rest, ( Joshua 10:1,26,42); and though the men of Judah retook it after his death, it having been got into the hands of the Jebusites again, ( Judges 1:8); yet either the fort of Zion was never taken by either of them, or if taken, the Jebusites got possession of it again, and held it until the times of David; (see 2 Samuel 5:6-9); but the Jebusites dwell with the children of Judah at Jerusalem unto this day ; the one in the fort of Zion, and the other in the city of Jerusalem, properly so called, and thus they continued unto the writing of this book; by which it should seem, that the Jebusites were not dispossessed of their fort, or a part of the city, by Joshua; or this might be added and inserted by some inspired man afterwards; or however it must be done before the times of David: and from the whole it appears, that the city of Jerusalem, at least a part of it, belonged to the tribe of Judah, as another part did to that of Benjamin, to which it is ascribed, ( Joshua 18:28); (see Judges 1:21).
Matthew Henry Commentary
Verses 20-63 - Here is a list of the cities of Judah. But we do not here fin Bethlehem, afterwards the city of David, and ennobled by the birth of our Lord Jesus in it. That city, which, at the best, was but littl among the thousands of Judah, Mic 5:2, except that it was thu honoured, was now so little as not to be accounted one of the cities __________________________________________________________________
Original Hebrew
ואת 854 היבוסי 2983 יושׁבי 3427 ירושׁלם 3389 לא 3808 יוכלו 3201 בני 1121 יהודה 3063 להורישׁם 3423 וישׁב 3427 היבוסי 2983 את 854 בני 1121 יהודה 3063 בירושׁלם 3389 עד 5704 היום 3117 הזה׃ 2088
