Anf-03 v.iv.vi.x Pg 14
1 Cor. xv. 35.
Having established the doctrine of the resurrection which was denied, it was natural5638 5638 Consequens erat.
to discuss what would be the sort of body (in the resurrection), of which no one had an idea. On this point we have other opponents with whom to engage. For Marcion does not in any wise admit the resurrection of the flesh, and it is only the salvation of the soul which he promises; consequently the question which he raises is not concerning the sort of body, but the very substance thereof. Notwithstanding,5639 5639 Porro.
he is most plainly refuted even from what the apostle advances respecting the quality of the body, in answer to those who ask, “How are the dead raised up? with what body do they come?” For as he treated of the sort of body, he of course ipso facto proclaimed in the argument that it was a body which would rise again. Indeed, since he proposes as his examples “wheat grain, or some other grain, to which God giveth a body, such as it hath pleased Him;”5640 5640
Anf-03 v.viii.xlviii Pg 18
1 Cor. xv. 35.
Now here he discusses the qualities of bodies, whether it be the very same, or different ones, which men are to resume. Since, however, such a question as this must be regarded as a subsequent one, it will in passing be enough for us that the resurrection is determined to be a bodily one even from this, that it is about the quality of bodies that the inquiry arises.
Edersheim Bible History
Lifetimes xi.i Pg 19.2
Treasury of Scriptural Knowledge, Chapter 15
VERSE (35) - Job 11:12; 22:13 Ps 73:11 Ec 11:5 Eze 37:3,11 Joh 3:4,9; 9:10
