SEV Biblia, Chapter 17:27
Sin embargo, para que no los ofendamos, ve al mar, y echa el anzuelo, y el primer pez que viniere, tmalo, y abierta su boca, hallars un esttero: tmalo, y dselo por mí y por ti.
Clarke's Bible Commentary - Matthew 17:27
Verse 27. Lest we-offend them] Be a stumbling-block to the priests, or rulers of the Jews, I will pay the tribute-go thou to the sea-cast a hook, and take the first fish-thou shalt find a piece of money, stathra, a stater. This piece of money was equal in value to four drachms, or two shekels, (five shillings of our money,) and consequently was sufficient to pay the tribute for our Lord and Peter, which amounted to about half-a-crown each. If the stater was in the mouth or belly of the fish before, who can help admiring the wisdom of Christ, that discovered it there? If it was not before in the mouth of the fish, who can help admiring the power of Christ, that impelled the fish to go where the stater had been lost in the bottom of the sea, take it up, come towards the shore where Peter was fishing, and, with the stater in its mouth or stomach, catch hold of the hook that was to draw it out of the water? But suppose there was no stater there, which is as likely as otherwise, then Jesus created it for the purpose, and here his omnipotence was shown; for to make a thing exist that did not exist before is an act of unlimited power, however small the thing itself may be. Some suppose that the haddock was the fish caught by Peter, because this fish has a blackish mark on each side of its neck or shoulders, as seems to exhibit the impression of a finger and thumb. The haddock is the gadus eglesinus. But this being a sea fish, could not be a native of the sea of Galilee or Tiberias, &c., for the river Jordan runs through the sea of Galilee, and falls into the Dead Sea, which has no outlet to the ocean: no sea fish of any kind can be found there; and we may add to this, that Belzoni, a learned traveler, who examined the produce of the lake of Tiberias, found only trouts, pikes, chevins, and tenches. That it may, besides these, have some fishes peculiar to itself, as most extensive fresh water lakes have, need not be denied; but it could have no sea fish.
THE account of the transfiguration, the peculiar case of the lunatic, with his cure, and the miracle wrought to pay the tribute money, render this one of the most interesting and instructive chapters in the New Testament.
1. To what has already been said on the subject of the transfiguration, nothing need be added: I have given that sense to it which the circumstances of the case, the construction of the words, and the analogy of faith warrant. That others have understood the whole transaction differently, is readily granted. Some of the foreign critics, who are also called divines, have stripped it, by their mode of interpretation, of all its strength, use, and meaning. With them, it is thus to be understood:-"Jesus, with his disciples, Peter, James, and John, went by night into a mountain, for the purpose of prayer and meditation; while thus engaged, the animal spirits of the disciples were overcome by watching and fatigue, and they fell asleep: in this sleep they dreamed, or Peter only dreamed, that he saw his Master encompassed with a glorious light, and that Moses and Elijah were conversing with him. That early in the morning, just as the sun was rising, there happened some electric or thunder-like explosions (a thing not unfrequent near some mountains) by which the disciples were suddenly awoke; that Peter, whose mind was strongly impressed with his dream, seeing the rising sun shine gloriously upon his Master, and his strongly impressed senses calling to remembrance his late vision, he for a moment imagined he saw, not only the glory of which he had dreamed, but the persons also-Moses and Elijah, still standing on the mount with Christ; that not being as yet sufficiently awake, finding the images impressed on his imagination fleeting away with his returning exercise of reason, he cried out, before he was aware, Lord! it is good for its to be here, let us make three tabernacles, &c.; but in a short time, having recovered the regular use of his senses, he perceived that it was a dream; and, having told it to our Lord and his brother disciples, lest the Jews might take occasion of jealousy from it, he was desired to tell the vision to no man." This is the substance of that strange explanation given by those learned men to this extraordinary transaction; a mode of interpretation only calculated to support that system which makes it an important point to deny and decry all supernatural and miraculous influence, and to explain away all the spirituality of the New Testament. Whatever ingenuity may be in this pretended elucidation, every unprejudiced person must see that it can never be brought to accord with the letter and concomitant circumstances of this most remarkable case.
2. The cure of the deaf and dumb lunatic has been treated, by the same critics, in nearly the same way, and for the same obvious design, namely, to exclude from the world all supernatural agency; and could they succeed in this, of what value, or, indeed, utility, could the whole New Testament be to mankind? We might be well astonished to find such a history, with such a great variety of curious and apparently interesting circumstances:-a wondrous person, labouring, preaching, suffering, dying, &c., &c., without having scarcely any thing in view, but a sort of merely moral reformation of the outward man! Truly, this:-" Is like an ocean into tempest toss'd, To waft a feather, or to drown a fly." But the truth of God's miraculous interpositions, the miracles of the New Testament, demoniacal possessions and influence, the atonement, the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, the regeneration of the corrupted human heart, &c., etc ,, must not be given up to please a certain description of persons, who have no commerce with God themselves, and cannot bear that others should either have or pretend to it.
3. The miracle wrought for the paying of the temple tribute money, is exceedingly remarkable. The note on ver. 27, brings this particularly to view. To what is there said, it may be added, that our Lord seems to have wrought this miracle for the following purposes:-1.
More forcibly to impress the minds of his disciples, and his followers in general, with the necessity and propriety of being subject to all the laws of the different states, kingdoms, &c., wheresoever the providence of God might cast their lot.
2. To show forth his own unlimited power and knowledge, that they might be fully convinced that he knew all things, even to the most minute; and could do whatsoever he pleased; and that both his wisdom and power were continually interested in behalf of his true disciples.
3. To teach all believers a firm trust and reliance on Divine Providence, the sources of which can never be exhausted; and which, directed by infinite wisdom and love, will make every provision essentially requisite for the comfort and support, of life. How many of the poor followers of Christ have been enabled to discern his kind hand, even in the means furnished them to discharge the taxes laid on them by the state! The profane and the unprincipled may deride, and mock on, but the people of God know it to be their duty, and their interest, to be subject to every ordinance of man for the Lord's sake; and, while his grace and providence render this obedience, in things both spiritual and secular, possible, his love, which their hearts feel, renders their duty their delight. The accomplishment of such ends as these is worthy both of the wisdom and benevolence of Christ.
John Gill's Bible Commentary
Ver. 27. Notwithstanding, lest we should offend them , etc.] Though Christ could have maintained his right of exemption from payment, by such strong and clear reasons and arguments; yet he chose to forego it, lest any should be offended with him, and look upon him as a transgressor of the law; one that had no regard to the temple, and slighted the worship and service of it, and so be prejudiced against him, and his doctrines: which, by the way, may teach us to be careful to give no offence, to Jew or Gentile, or the church of God; though it may be to our own disadvantage, when the honour and interest of religion lie at stake. This is following the example of Christ, who therefore said to Peter, go thou to the sea ; of Tiberias, which was near this city, and cast an hook ; a fishers hook into it: and take up the fish that first cometh up, and when thou hast opened his mouth, thou shalt find a piece of money : a stater, as in the original text, the same with the arytsa of the Talmudists; and which word the Syriac version here retains, and was, they tell us, of the same value with a sela, or shekel of the province. The Arabic and Persic versions render it, by four drachms, which also were the same with a shekel: and so was just enough to pay the two half shekels, for Christ and Peter, and was worth, of our money, near half a crown; and not nearly a crown, as in a late paraphrase is said, through mistake. This was a wonderful instance of the omniscience of Christ, who knew there was in such a fish, such a piece of money, as exactly answered the present exigence, and that that would come first to Peters hook; and of his omnipotence, if not in forming this piece of money immediately in the fishs mouth, as is thought by some, yet in causing this fish to come to Peters hook first, and as soon as cast in; and of his power and dominion over all creatures, even over the fishes of the sea; and so proved himself to be what he suggested, the Son of the King of kings; and to be a greater person than the kings of the earth, to whom tribute was paid: and yet, at the same time, it declares his great poverty as man, that he had not a shekel to pay on such an occasion, without working a miracle; and his great condescension to do it, rather than give offence by non-payment: and take, and give unto them for me and thee ; for the half shekel was expected of Peter, as well as of Christ, and he had not wherewith to pay it; and this Christ knew, and therefore provides for both. But why did not Christ pay for the other disciples, as well as for himself and Peter? It may be replied, that this money would pay for no more than two: but this is not a full answer; Christ could have ordered more money in the same way he did this: it may then be further said, that only he and Peter were looked upon as inhabitants of this place; and so the rest were not called upon here, but in their respective cities, where they might pay also, and, besides, were not now present.
Matthew Henry Commentary
Verses 24-27 - Peter felt sure that his Master was ready to do what was right. Chris spoke first to give him proof that no thought can be withholden from him. We must never decline our duty for fear of giving offence; but we must sometimes deny ourselves in our worldly interests, rather tha give offence. However the money was lodged in the fish, He who know all things alone could know it, and only almighty power could bring it to Peter's hook. The power and the poverty of Christ should be mentioned together. If called by providence to be poor, like our Lord let us trust in his power, and our God shall supply all our need according to his riches in glory by Christ Jesus. In the way of obedience, in the course, perhaps, of our usual calling, as he helpe Peter, so he will help us. And if any sudden call should occur, whic we are not prepared to meet, let us not apply to others, till we firs seek Christ __________________________________________________________________
Greek Textus Receptus
ινα 2443 CONJ δε 1161 CONJ μη 3361 PRT-N σκανδαλισωμεν 4624 5661 V-AAS-1P αυτους 846 P-APM πορευθεις 4198 5679 V-AOP-NSM εις 1519 PREP την 3588 T-ASF θαλασσαν 2281 N-ASF βαλε 906 5628 V-2AAM-2S αγκιστρον 44 N-ASN και 2532 CONJ τον 3588 T-ASM αναβαντα 305 5631 V-2AAP-ASM πρωτον 4412 ADV ιχθυν 2486 N-ASM αρον 142 5657 V-AAM-2S και 2532 CONJ ανοιξας 455 5660 V-AAP-NSM το 3588 T-ASN στομα 4750 N-ASN αυτου 846 P-GSM ευρησεις 2147 5692 V-FAI-2S στατηρα 4715 N-ASM εκεινον 1565 D-ASM λαβων 2983 5631 V-2AAP-NSM δος 1325 5628 V-2AAM-2S αυτοις 846 P-DPM αντι 473 PREP εμου 1700 P-1GS και 2532 CONJ σου 4675 P-2GS
Vincent's NT Word Studies
27. Hook (agkistron). The only mention in the New Testament of fishing with a hook. A single fish is wanted.A piece of money (stathra). The A.V. is very inadequate, because Christ names a definite sum, the stater, which is a literal transcription of the Greek word, and represents two didrachmas, or a shekel. Hence Rev., a shekel.
Robertson's NT Word Studies
17:27 {Lest we cause them to stumble} (hina me skandaliswmen autous). He does not wish to create the impression that he and the disciples despise the temple and its worship. Aorist tense (punctiliar single act) here, though some MSS. have present subjunctive (linear). "A hook" (agkistron). The only example in the N.T. of fishing with a hook. From an unused verb agkiz", to angle, and that from agkos, a curve (so also agkale the inner curve of the arm, #Lu 2:38). {First cometh up} (ton anabanta prwton ichthun). More correctly, "the first fish that cometh up." {A shekel} (statra). Greek stater = four drachmae, enough for two persons to pay the tax. {For me and thee} (anti emou kai sou). Common use of anti in commercial transactions, "in exchange for." Here we have a miracle of foreknowledge. Such instances have happened. Some try to get rid of the miracle by calling it a proverb or by saying that Jesus only meant for Peter to sell the fish and thus get the money, a species of nervous anxiety to relieve Christ and the Gospel of Matthew from the miraculous. "All the attempts have been in vain which were made by the older Rationalism to put a non-miraculous meaning into these words" (B. Weiss). It is not stated that Peter actually caught such a fish though that is the natural implication. Why provision is thus only made for Peter along with Jesus we do not know.
